The Debt Trap of Development: Analysing Kerala's Fiscal Crisis and Future Pathways

The Debt Trap of Development: Analysing Kerala's Fiscal Crisis and Future Pathways

---

Introduction: The Price of Progress

Kerala has long been hailed as a model for inclusive development in India. Its achievements in literacy, public healthcare, and social equality have drawn admiration both nationally and globally. However, beneath this shining surface lies a deepening economic dilemma. The state’s fiscal health is deteriorating rapidly, and signs of financial distress are becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. Salary delays, heavy borrowings, and soaring public debt paint a picture of a state teetering on the edge of a fiscal crisis. This article examines the roots of Kerala’s financial predicament, the structural flaws of its development model, and the potential remedies that might still be within reach.

The Development Paradox

Since the 1980s, Kerala has pursued a unique path that prioritised human development over rapid industrialisation. While this strategy yielded impressive social outcomes, it created a structural imbalance in the state’s economy. The state continued to spend heavily on welfare schemes and public services even as its revenue-generating capacity remained modest. To bridge the gap, Kerala increasingly depended on external sources — chiefly central government transfers, GST compensation, and above all, remittances from Keralites working abroad, particularly in the Gulf countries. This model, while socially just and politically popular, gradually became fiscally unsustainable.

Kerala's public debt has now crossed ₹3.5 lakh crore, with a debt-to-GSDP ratio exceeding 37%, one of the highest among Indian states. A worrying aspect is that nearly 70% of the state’s revenue is used merely to pay salaries, pensions, and interest on past loans, leaving little for development expenditure. Unlike capital expenditure, which builds assets and boosts long-term productivity, Kerala’s borrowing has often been used to fund routine administrative expenses. This results in a chronic revenue deficit — a condition where the government spends more on its day-to-day operations than it earns in revenue. In effect, the state is borrowing not to build infrastructure but to pay its bills.

The Eroding Cushion of Remittances

For decades, Kerala’s economy has been propped up by an exceptional inflow of remittances from the Gulf countries. Non-Resident Keralites (NRKs) sent home billions of rupees annually, cushioning the state from many of the consequences of its limited industrial base. These remittances not only supported families but also spurred consumption, helped finance housing, and indirectly boosted the state’s service sector.

However, this cushion is no longer as soft as it once was. The Gulf countries are undergoing rapid economic diversification and are gradually reducing their dependence on foreign labour. Policies like labour nationalisation and visa restrictions are making it harder for Keralites to secure jobs abroad. Additionally, the newer generation of Keralites raised abroad is less likely to remit money to their ancestral homes. These changes signal the beginning of a long-term decline in remittance inflows, further straining Kerala’s economy.

Caught in the Web of Populism

Kerala’s generous welfare policies — such as free public healthcare, universal education, old-age pensions, and subsidised food — have become central to its political culture. These schemes are seen not only as entitlements but as moral cornerstones of the Kerala model. However, this has created a political economy of populism where cutting back on welfare, however necessary, is considered political suicide. As a result, even modest reforms are met with strong resistance from public sector unions, political parties, and civil society.

This resistance has led to budgetary inflexibility. While the state’s needs have grown, its ability to redirect spending or restructure inefficient schemes has remained stagnant. Welfare schemes are often duplicated across departments, and leakages persist despite digital reforms. The result is a bloated expenditure structure that leaves the state vulnerable to even minor economic shocks.

Tensions Between Centre and State

Another dimension of Kerala’s fiscal crisis is the growing friction between the state and the central government. Successive finance ministers of Kerala have accused the Centre of imposing arbitrary borrowing caps and delaying GST compensation. The 15th Finance Commission’s revised formula for devolving central taxes has further reduced Kerala’s share. Kerala argues that it is being punished for its past successes in controlling population growth and improving social indicators, which ironically result in a smaller formula-based allocation.

The Centre, for its part, contends that fiscal prudence is necessary to prevent a nationwide debt crisis. It argues that high-deficit states like Kerala must curb unproductive spending and adhere to borrowing norms. This tug-of-war has escalated into a political blame game, even as the real problem — fiscal imbalance — remains unaddressed.

Expert Opinions and Divided Views

Economists are sharply divided on Kerala’s situation. Supporters of the Kerala model argue that the state's high levels of human capital and public service delivery justify a more flexible fiscal framework. They see Kerala as a victim of India’s centralised fiscal system and argue for greater autonomy in borrowing and taxation.

On the other hand, critics maintain that Kerala must fundamentally restructure its economy. They argue that the state’s development model has become overly reliant on public spending and needs a strong private sector push. According to this view, Kerala must attract investments, rationalise subsidies, and encourage entrepreneurship if it wants to sustain its welfare state.

Reforms: The Only Way Forward

Reforms are inevitable if Kerala wants to break free from this fiscal quicksand. First, the state must overhaul its tax collection system. Though GST has limited states’ taxation powers, Kerala can still improve compliance and expand its local tax base. For instance, property tax remains underutilised due to outdated valuation systems and weak enforcement.

Second, welfare schemes must be made more efficient and targeted. Rather than blanket subsidies, the state could adopt conditional cash transfers linked to health, education, or employment outcomes. Streamlining schemes and eliminating duplication can save precious resources without compromising on social justice.

Third, administrative reforms are long overdue. E-governance can reduce overhead costs, while pension reforms — including the introduction of contributory schemes for new employees — can ease long-term fiscal pressure. Downsizing non-essential departments and restructuring loss-making public sector units will also be critical.

Fourth, Kerala must make itself more attractive to private investors. This requires simplifying land acquisition laws, ensuring stable policy environments, and developing special economic zones for sectors such as tourism, IT, and healthcare. Kerala’s educated workforce is its biggest asset — it must now translate that into job-creating investments.

Fifth, empowering local governments to raise and manage their own revenue can improve both efficiency and accountability. Panchayats and municipalities must be equipped with modern tools to map assets, plan budgets, and deliver services effectively.

Additionally, monetising idle government assets — such as land and unused buildings — can generate non-tax revenue. Kerala can lease tourism properties, restructure transport services, and develop heritage infrastructure through public-private partnerships.

Finally, Kerala must engage more constructively with the Centre. Rather than confrontation, the state should build coalitions with other states facing similar challenges and press for a more equitable federal fiscal structure. A united voice may have better chances of influencing future Finance Commission recommendations.

Lessons from Home and Abroad

Kerala doesn’t have to look far for examples. Tamil Nadu, for instance, has managed to contain its deficit without sacrificing its welfare commitments by adopting smart reforms. Even Kerala itself, during the late 1990s, had embarked on fiscal responsibility measures and downsized inefficient programs.

Internationally, Sri Lanka’s crisis serves as a grim reminder of the consequences of unchecked populism and mounting debt. Though Kerala is far from such a breakdown, the warning signs are not entirely irrelevant.

Two Futures: Which Path Will Kerala Choose?

Kerala now stands at a crossroads. In one possible future, the state recognises the gravity of the crisis, embraces reform, and transforms into a sustainable knowledge-based economy rooted in human capital. In another future, it clings to outdated models, accumulates more debt, and slides into economic stagnation and social unrest.

The next five years are crucial. The decisions made now — or delayed — will determine whether Kerala emerges as a fiscally resilient state or becomes a cautionary tale in India's development narrative.

Conclusion: Reform Is Not a Choice — It Is a Necessity

Kerala’s identity as a socially progressive and inclusive state is worth preserving. But preserving it requires bold and painful decisions. The state can no longer afford to postpone reforms. To sustain the gains of the past, Kerala must confront the hard economic truths of the present. Fiscal sustainability is not the enemy of social justice — it is its foundation. And that foundation must now be rebuilt.